Newspapers listed below the opinion piece
are known to have used the letters.
Others may have used the letters without my knowing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Where's the common sense?
November, 2002
The political correctness of "it's somebody else's
fault'' is running rampant. The prosecutors in the Teresa Hedlund case are
stretching beyond common sense. How far is the blame going? Why not blame the
manufacturer of the camera for not placing a notice on the camera? We did blame
the cigarette companies for the smoker's stupidity and cigarettes have a warning
notice.
Teresa Hedlund may be guilty of many things, but to say she caused
the driver, Thomas Stewart, to act irresponsible because of a camera is absurd.
Stewart and the passengers were showing off because they were drunk. They needed
no help to be stupid. All chose to drink knowing their responsibility flies out
the window with their liquored breath.
Political correctness is wrongness with lack of common sense to a
logical conclusion based upon primary cause and effect. Let's get real.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, 11-21- 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pam Roach
November, 2002
Bias — there's no bias here!
The South County Journal has endorsed Yvonne Ward over Pam Roach
because of Pam's character. Character did not matter with Bill Clinton.
Pam may have some rough edges, but she is working on them. The
staunchest Republicans support Pam Roach. The staunch Republicans the Journal
refers to, if pegging the individual's right, are more moderate than staunch. I
had been Chairman of the 31st District King County Republicans over the past
year and have seen improvements in Pam's demeanor.
Yvonne Ward, a Democrat maverick for what she stands for, probably
will not be allowed by the Democratic caucus to be very effective. If she does
not conform to their line of thinking she will not be able to get bills onto the
floor. Once the extreme liberals gained control of the Democratic Party they
changed the direction away from what is good for America. Yvonne Ward is the
Democrat of 20 years ago and if elected, and her positions compromised, will be
viewed as just another liberal Democrat running as conservative yet governing as
a liberal elite.
We know Pam Roach is a senator who votes for America and who will
listen and take action when confronted with her own rough edges. Pam has been
good for our community.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal - 11-01- 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Issaquah teachers are setting an example for the children they
teach, a bad example. Civil disobedience is one thing when that individual
accepts, and is willing to pay the consequences. When Dr. Martin Luther King
exercised civil disobedience, he went to jail.
The Issaquah teachers are complaining about a judge's ruling to
uphold current law. A strike by public employees is illegal. I would think the
teachers would be jeopardizing their jobs participating in illegal activities
that affected their job performance, but that is an issue for the Issaquah
School Board.
The duty of the judge is to uphold the laws, not to define them as
opposite of what they are. If a person wants to have the right to strike, they
should avoid public service jobs or lobby to have the existing law changed. They
should not have expected the judge to throw the decision to an illegal outcome.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, 10-03- 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flag Waver
September, 2002
I was a
flag-waver before the attacks of Sept. 11.
I now feel even stronger in a strong defense in our military as well as
the intelligence agencies. Peace is maintained by a strong military. As long as
peace is not the goal of other nations, then we must be prepared to fight to
keep the peace we have
Terrorism, the global nightmare, has come to America. Safety is our
goal but cannot in a free society be secure.
I have learned that total liberty is not possible if security is
desired. The balance between freedom and security is fragile. Liberty is
maintained by responsible freedom.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Chicago Tribune
(IL), 09-03-2002, pg. 18;
NY Newsday (NY), 09-03-02;
South Florida Sun Sentinel (FL), 09-03-02;
South Florida.com, 09-03-02;
Orlando Sentinel (FL), 09-03-02;
The Morning Call (PA), 09-03-02;
Greenwich Time (CT), 09-03-02; Snohomish Tribune (WA), 09-?-02;
Merge digital.com (PA), 09-03-02;
Seattle Times (WA), 09-08-02;
Baltimore
Sun (MD), 09-03-02 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
Also used on the websites of:
WB2 (CO), 09-03-02;
WB11 (NY), 09-03-2002;
WB39 (FL), 09-03-02;
7cities (PA), 09-03-02;
WXMI FOX17 (MI), 09-03-02
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pledge for liberty
July, 2002
It was a bold move to declare even a part of the “Pledge of Allegiance”
unconstitutional. This should alert all who have the unbiased sense God gave
them as to the direction the liberals desire to direct this country away from
freedom
Thomas Jefferson said, “It is a very dangerous doctrine to consider the
judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions. It is one which
would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Local Planet, 7-4-2002;
Seattle Press, 7-4-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cater to Criminals
August, 2002
They cater to criminals. Just one barometer that reveals
the tactics of Democrat leaders to gain votes are the various protests. The
liberal protests against conservative causes and personalities seem to be much
more unruly than when a conservative group protests against the liberal causes
and personalities.
The Democrats cater to the criminal participants by
supporting and enacting laws that are light on criminals. Lighter sentences and
decriminalization of illegal activity draws the votes of those who would tend to
break our laws and those who would vote illegally (convicted felons are not
allowed to vote). It is not surprising that there would be more disruptive
participants among liberal protesters considering that criminals are one special
interest group that helps to maintain the power of the Democratic Party.
In vying for the criminal vote, today's Democratic Party is
making society less safe for the rest of us. Liberal political correctness
restricts our peace officers from performing their duties swaying the scales in
favor of the criminal.
Votes are more important to the Democratic leaders than a
safe America. Watch the protests and you can see the difference. If we keep this
up the criminals will be running the asylums, prisons and our lives.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, 8-30- 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Traffic Lesson
August, 2002
Journal reporter Matt Thompson, in reporting a public
interest story, has hit on an a solution to our traffic problems. It is not
``the'' solution, but can make a noticeable dent in the rush hour commute time.
No taxes are required, just responsibility of the media and ourselves. Education
of the commuters can make a difference. Ignorance of the ``Rules of the Road''
can cause accidents, road rage and death. There are no great drivers; we all
make mistakes.
Thompson reported at the end of the article that highway
merge lanes should be driven to the full extent making a smooth merge into the
main traffic flow. I find it is much easier and less stressful to utilize the
full space in picking out an adequate space to merge into. I even have time to
choose a backup plan should an inconsiderate driver speed up to close my first
choice. I especially enjoy the car behind me illegally zipping across the white
frog lines to either drive in my blind spot, or closing the gap that would have
allowed me to make a smooth transition into the traffic.
I applaud Thompson for his inclusion of the merging lesson
and hope to see the Journal incorporate more lessons into their reporting. This,
of course, is assuming the reader will examine his own driving skills, and learn
from the information reported. The ultimate responsibility for safety lies with
you and me, the driver.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal - 8-20- 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Addressing
traffic problems
August 2002
Look at all options when addressing traffic problems
Transit is one of the most difficult problems
to solve in the Northwest. We often look at the subways and trolley systems that
operate elsewhere and say that they can be the answer. Most existing subway and
trolley systems were installed when construction costs were substantially lower
than today. Forget inflation, today we have the added cost of all the added
safety measures. We have the cost of the environmental impact statements. Then
there is the fact that today we have to pay for the land that once was simply
taken.
Ridership was not much of a problem in decades past as the love
affair with the automobile had not yet begun. Mass transit had a greater appeal
than today as we simply hop into our cars and drive anywhere our hearts desire.
Speed and convenience are essential components in the success of mass transit.
Building systems that must slow as they cross existing roads also slowing
automobile traffic is self-defeating. It is time to consider the alternatives
that would allow higher speeds without crossing existing traffic conduits.
Underground or overhead are the only common sense approach except
for the consideration of cost. But since we are hell-bent on spending the money
we move slowly on.
Underground is much too costly as Seattle’s bus tunnels have taught. The
only approach that avoids conflicts while achieving higher speeds is the
monorail proposals. We must consider all possibilities without ignoring others
if we are to achieve any success in the improvement of our traffic woes.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Enumclaw Courier Herald, 08-9-2002;
Seattle
Press, 08-15-2002;
Federal Way Mirror, 08-28-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blatantly liberal
June,
2002
In a recent Associated Press article by Paul Queary, the press bias is
plainly exhibited ("Millions
at stake as national GOP failed to report contributions," Local News,
July 23). The bias was expounded upon by the contributions of Times' Olympia
bureau reporter Ralph Thomas
The original story was mainly about irregularities of Democratic
contributions by unions, yet early in the article a big play was made to
demonize the Republicans. It said it could cost Republicans millions,
without giving details. This article basically played down (while still
subtly telling the truth) about union contributions to the Democrats.
Grant it, a small mention that the Republicans were being
investigated would have been prudent. However, The Times reporter played up
the Republican angle even greater. This article downplayed the facts that
the unions and Democrats were investigated and found guilty on many counts
of violating campaign finance laws
- Roger
W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Seattle Times, June 30, 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Warriors of Peace June, 2002
A police officer is killed. A naked man
pulled the trigger, but our politically correct society killed the cop. We put
our peace officers at risk by giving the criminals rights to which they do not
deserve.
Just to serve in these mixed-up liberal times makes an
officer a hero, let alone the actual heroic deeds. We restrict our public
servants in their ability to protect the public and themselves. Our police
officers are warriors of peace. A warrior is less effective when fear is
present.
We must allow our officers the necessary tools and
discretion to protect themselves, to protect you and me.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Seattle Times, 06-25-2002;
South County Journal, 06-27-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Judges usurp authority
July,
2002
The liberals have made a great mistake.
They have become overconfident in their social victories. In the slow heating of
anti-American values they have become impatient, thus showing their true intent:
the tearing down of the premise of liberty.
Our judges are
usurping their authority. The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has been the
testing ground of the liberal agenda's tactics of distorting the meaning of our
foundations. The Ninth Circuit Court is the most liberal court in our nation and
has been overturned more than any other (Supreme) court in history.
It was a bold
move to declare even a part of the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional. This
should alert all who have the unbiased sense God gave them as to the direction
the liberals desire to direct this country away from freedom.
The liberal
elite in their attempts to destroy the fabric of American freedom cannot win
without the aid of activist courts ruling against our foundations. We can expect
more as the Democrats exert their partisan opposition to President Bush's
judicial appointments in favor of these types of liberal activist judicial
nominees. We can also expect similar decisions from Clinton's appointments that
were ratified by the misguided nonpartisan actions of the Republicans.
The
preservation of liberty is being fought on two fronts: The war on terrorism and
the war of ideologies. One if by land and two if by court.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, 7-08-2002;
The Local Planet.com, July 04, 2002;
The
Seattle Press, July 04, 2002;
Federal Way Mirror, 7-3-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Foundation
Heritage
June 27, 2002
To preserve the
foundations of American liberty we must preserve our heritage. It is through
these landmarks, the symbols of freedom, that our children learn the value of
liberty.
-
Roger W Hancock
Presidents House in Philadelphia - Petition Archive - 6-27-2002
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What happened to the Democrats
June, 2002
The Democrats
were once the "Party of the People." What has happened?
The Democratic
Party opposed Republicans when increasing funds for the school lunch programs.
They opposed Republicans over increasing the minimum wage. They oppose
Republicans about getting tough on criminals to protect the people. They oppose
Republicans in attempts to restrain taxation. They oppose Republican talk about
requiring accountability in our government.
Democrats are
in opposition to whatever the Republicans are promoting at the time, but will
later take the opposed Republican issue, rework it, dumb it down, then present
it as their own. After the Republican issue receives some acclaim, Democrats
will distort and outright lie about it to gain the people's opposition.
The Democratic Party today exists only to obtain power and with
that power to enact laws that abate our freedoms. All you need to do is look at
what they support and how they propose to enforce or enact their issues. The
Democratic Party -- those who run and control the party -- remind me of the
Communist Party and the Cold War. The leaders enjoy the high-life while
governing to keep the people oppressed.
Democratic policies, whether intentional or not, are leading
America away from liberties to a new American Socialist way. Are they the
``Party of the People'' or the ``Socialist Party of the People''? I'm wondering,
is this the new Democrat?
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"Federal Way Mirror,
June 19, 2002; Seattle
P-I, June 24, 2002;
South County Journal, 7-14-2002; Auburn Reporter, 11-13-2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Give us a break
May, 2002
King County Executive Ron Sims and
County Council Democrats are targeting budget cuts on those services that are
visible to the public. We are seeing the closure of our parks as one such
deliberate act. They should be concentrating on the waste, not the visible. But
they have an agenda to grow government to build their power base and to tax
However, when the people have a
choice, and are willing to make cuts, it is the visible that suffers. Our
schools are the first item to be cut. Not by design, but because it is visible,
the easiest vote to say, "no.'' While the liberals seek to tax us into lower
income levels, the schools are left as vulnerable targets
The teacher unions that support
the agenda of the liberal Democrats are helping to weaken their power to help
their members. Support more taxation and the schools will suffer. Taxes are too
high.
When will the Democrat
representatives get the message? The people vote for initiatives that lower
taxes and vote against school bonds and levies. As the people have been
attempting more and more to voice their message of "lower taxes,'', the liberal
elite continue to ignore and seek new and innovative ways to tax and oppress.
All we are saying, is "give us a break.''
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, May 10, 2002;
Auburn Reporter, May 22, 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
©
Copyright 2002, Roger W Hancock
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Issue is
manipulated to further restrict freedoms
May, 2002
If Bush is a tool of the polluters, then the environmentalists are
tools of socialism. In the guise of environmentalism, prevailing is the
restriction of our freedoms. Government is slowly taking over private businesses
and our lives one regulation at a time.
To blame Bush for past failed policies is just
plain stupid. Give him a chance; let's see what will come of his efforts. Oh,
how stupid of me; it will not matter what he does because it will be wrong. He
will be criticized even for the good, for they shall distort the truth and the
apathetic will follow, believing every word.
Global warming: Is it true or
false? We hear much about it as the media treat it as fact. When supporting
information is reported, we get only one side of the issue. There is other
information that supports no global warming. We do not hear of those opposing
views, facts and opinions; it is not the politically correct position to take.
What about truth? What about hearing all sides of an issue?
The environmentalists get so
concerned about oil spills and fail to see or purposely ignore the fact that
more oil is leaked into the oceans from the bowels of Mother Earth. That oil is
assimilated into the mass waters of the deep. Yes, it can be devastating to the
beaches when washed up on land. That is why precautions and emergency plans are
developed. Even then, if left alone, Mother Nature would correct man's mistake.
The issue of the environment is
being manipulated for the purpose of further restricting our freedoms. Where
liberty is suppressed, socialism is able to gain ground, ever slowly.
Incrementally, our liberty wanes.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Seattle P-I - May 01, 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CLONING
- Much goes into taste
May 01, 2002
In a recent issue of the South County Journal, an Associated
Press article reported that cloning could increase production of high quality
meat. We are searching for "pie in the sky.''
Genetics alone does not make the beef. The feed has much to
do with the taste of the meat. Wild game usually has a much wilder, somewhat
harsher taste than domesticated animals. Stress factors have much to do with the
efficiency of an individual animal's metabolism.
Of course, the personality has little to do with the taste
as we bite into that tender morsel or seemingly tough shoe leather.
- Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, May 01, 2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Keep
Super-Majority March 2003
The School Levy's 60
percent super-majority is necessary to equalize the representation of those who
pay the tax. All registered voters can vote for the school levies, but only
those who own property will have the tax levied against them. This is taxation
with unbalanced representation at best.
I do not care how badly the money is needed, this is America. This
is the country that fought the Revolutionary War in part over "taxation without
representation." If we are to give up what created this country and that which
has made it great, then let's mandate twice as much for schools and government.
The liberals would be ecstatic if they did not need votes over excess taxation.
To do away with the 60 percent majority to pass a school levy is
tactic of fascist style. Reduce the say of the taxpayer to increase the
probability of maintaining the tax burden on only the property owners. Were the
taxes to be levied upon all citizens, a simple majority would be prudent and
fair. When the taxation is levied upon only some and not others with the others
having a say, we have inequality.
America is the country where equality is promoted while inequality
is maintained in the lack of representation of the levy payers. The 60 percent
super majority helps to strengthen the voice of those who pay while still giving
a voice to those with no vested monetary interest.
Maintain the super-majority or change the levy tax structure so
that all who have a say, also pay.
- Roger
W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
The
Seattle Press, Mar. 14, 2002;
Federal Way Mirror, 4-15-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vote him out in November
March 2002
In subsequent remarks
after the recent Legislature's vote on the 60 percent supermajority, Chris Hurst
seems to be putting his foot into his mouth again. Let's see, during his tenure
as representative, he has demeaned women in his campaign manual, which said they
are easily manipulated, as well as being most unflattering to the elderly of our
society. In a campaign flier he lied, blaming his opponent for a flier against
him, and then in the next paragraph he tells who actually published the
pamphlet. It was not his opponent. Hurst has a history of stating lies seemingly
without considering how ridiculous it makes him appear.
Now it seems Chris Hurst, who is a Black Diamond police officer,
not only could not tell the difference between two different vehicles, he also
did not even attempt to verify his facts. Again he puts his foot into his mouth.
In Hurst's usual manner to put down others, he again lies. He claimed seeing
Rep. Jack Cairnes behind the wheel of a vehicle that had not been operational
for more than a month. He lied about seeing Jack Cairnes and did not even
recognize the vehicle he saw as a different vehicle.
I want a representative who I can trust, certainly one who is not
so obviously a liar as Chris Hurst. There is an election coming up next November
that can remedy the Hurst situation. Vote for integrity. Vote "no'' on Chris
Hurst.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, Mar 05, 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Precinct Caucus
March 2002
March 5 is the date set for the precinct caucus –– next to voting,
the most important activity for you to affect public policy.
The precinct caucus is for you to express your concerns that will
help to develop the platform of the major political parties. This is also where
those interested can begin to become a participant in the political process.
Whether to become a party volunteer or only to voice your views, caucus night is
your chance to be heard. It is the vocal who define the focal point.
The precinct caucus is mandated by the state of Washington to be held every two
years. Issues are considered for inclusion into the party platform, as well as
voting on delegates to the district and county conventions.
The precinct committee officer is an official elected office. Each
precinct has two precinct committee officers, one for each party. That person is
the chairman of the precinct caucus and the grassroots contact for that party.
The precinct committee officer has the privilege to be an automatic delegate to
the first rounds of conventions.
The precinct caucus is often held in the home of the current
precinct committee officer for that party. Other locations may be at a nearby
school or other suitable place.
For information on where your precinct caucus is being held, contact the county
headquarters for your party. Contact phone numbers are: King County Republicans,
(206) 378-1998; Pierce County Republicans, (253) 383-1795; King County
Democrats, (206) 622-9157; and Pierce County Democrats, (253) 535-4769
Republicans in the 31st District of King County can find their
location on the Internet at www.31gop.org (click on “Caucus Meetings”). The 31st
District includes Enumclaw, most of Auburn and southern parts of Kent.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
Federal Way Mirror, 3-01-2002
(The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ENRON -
February, 2002
What's with all the attempts to tie Enron to the Bush
administration? Top Enron executives contributed substantially to the Clinton
Library. What favors were exchanged? What of the other Clinton and Enron
connections? Vice President Cheney inherited from the Clinton administration an
ongoing connection with Enron, yet the focus is on Cheney.
Enron received a ``no'' when asked for the help of
the Bush administration. I've heard very little about the probable favors
exchanged between Enron and the Clinton/Gore administration.
The media makes every attempt to make even the normal
and legal interchange between Enron and the Bush administration look as though
it is wrongdoing. Then they avoid reporting the many connections with the
Clinton/Gore administration.
But, no, the media is not biased.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
The Seattle Press, Feb. 14, 2001;
South County Journal, Feb 22, 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lewis thinks about
citizens
February, 2002
Auburn Mayor Pete Lewis has been digging right into
his new job bringing some common sense with him by taking a fresh look at
current projects. A price tag of $27 million should raise an eyebrow to anyone
in a city the size of Auburn. Money, often, does not seem to be an issue to many
politicians.
Mayor Lewis is showing himself to be a man of the
people. He is looking out for our hard earned money that is now in the coffers
of our city government.
Auburn may need a public safety building, but no need
is so crucial that it be pushed to finalization at all costs.
So many alternatives have been presented by the
mayor, one has to wonder how the current plan has stayed on course with the
price tag of $27 million.
Thank you, mayor, for watching out for the citizens
of Auburn; for watching out for my pocketbook.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, Feb 15, 2002; Auburn Reporter - Mar 27, 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Give police needed tools
January, 2003
The high-speed chases on Dec. 29 (Federal Way to
Fife) and on Dec. 31 (Algona, Pacific and Auburn) may not have been successful
20 years ago. This is one example where the tools needed to do the job have been
provided to our law-enforcement officers.
Then, listening to my
police scanner, I remember a high-speed chase involving a motorcyclist. The
cyclist drove closer to Pierce County where King County police had no
jurisdiction. The dispatchers became agitated, being unable to reach their
contacts with the Pierce County police. The motorcyclist continued within King
County, doubling back and finally ending the chase when he dumped the bike near
Highway 18.
Since then our police officers have been given commissions
allowing authorization to pursue suspects into other jurisdictions. As in the
Dec. 29 incident, inter-jurisdiction pursuit has proven to be a valuable
enforcement tool.
These days, in being politically correct, we hog-tie our
protectorates. Characteristic profiling is being restricted if the suspect's
prominent characteristic is, or is representative of, his race. If an officer is
a racist it will show in many other ways. Let our police do their jobs without
fear that the right decision will be politically incorrect.
The chases did not require profiling other than gross
traffic violations and mismatched ownership of the vehicles. The tools were
there to complete the task at hand. Allow them the tools for efficient police
work in every aspect of law enforcement. We must not restrict our peace officers
from keeping the peace.
-
Roger W Hancock
Printed
as a "Letter to the Editor,"
South County Journal, Jan 06, 2002 (The
Papers often edit for space and other criteria.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2001 Archives
-2002- 2003
Archives
|